Close
22 May 2026
Ahpra and the National Boards are advising practitioners to consider whether telehealth is an appropriate alternative to in-person consultations during the global fuel crisis.
With Australians being urged to conserve fuel, practitioners can play a role in supporting patients and the healthcare system to avoid unnecessary travel – but only when it is safe to do so.
This may include opting for telehealth instead of in-person appointments, and replacing regular home visits with telehealth check-ins, where clinically appropriate.
Acknowledging people in regional and remote areas already travel long distances to access health services, Ahpra CEO Justin Untersteiner said practitioners should continue doing what is best for their patients.
‘Ahpra and the National Boards are concerned patients may avoid health services altogether if their travel costs become too expensive,’ Mr Untersteiner said.
‘Practitioners should carefully consider whether telehealth is an appropriate alternative to in-person consultations. We want to ensure people get the care they need without compromising on quality and safety.’
While telehealth may be clinically appropriate for some patients, practitioners must continue to meet their professional obligations. The standard of care expected for telehealth is the same as for in-person care, even in periods of service disruption.
Practitioners are reminded of the National Boards’ telehealth guidance and information provided by the Medical Board of Australia in relation to telehealth consultations with patients. These resources make it clear that:
Ahpra and the National Boards will continue monitoring the impact of higher fuel costs and provide further advice for practitioners if required.